This guide is for pandas’ maintainers. It may also be interesting to contributors looking to understand the pandas development process and what steps are necessary to become a maintainer.
The main contributing guide is available at Contributing to pandas.
pandas uses two levels of permissions: triage and core team members.
Triage members can label and close issues and pull requests.
Core team members can label and close issues and pull request, and can merge pull requests.
GitHub publishes the full list of permissions.
pandas is largely a volunteer project, so these tasks shouldn’t be read as “expectations” of triage and maintainers. Rather, they’re general descriptions of what it means to be a maintainer.
Triage newly filed issues (see Issue triage)
Review newly opened pull requests
Respond to updates on existing issues and pull requests
Drive discussion and decisions on stalled issues and pull requests
Provide experience / wisdom on API design questions to ensure consistency and maintainability
Project organization (run / attend developer meetings, represent pandas)
https://matthewrocklin.com/blog/2019/05/18/maintainer may be interesting background reading.
Here’s a typical workflow for triaging a newly opened issue.
Thank the reporter for opening an issue
The issue tracker is many people’s first interaction with the pandas project itself, beyond just using the library. As such, we want it to be a welcoming, pleasant experience.
Is the necessary information provided?
Ideally reporters would fill out the issue template, but many don’t. If crucial information (like the version of pandas they used), is missing feel free to ask for that and label the issue with “Needs info”. The report should follow the guidelines in Bug reports and enhancement requests. You may want to link to that if they didn’t follow the template.
Make sure that the title accurately reflects the issue. Edit it yourself if it’s not clear.
Is this a duplicate issue?
We have many open issues. If a new issue is clearly a duplicate, label the new issue as “Duplicate” assign the milestone “No Action”, and close the issue with a link to the original issue. Make sure to still thank the reporter, and encourage them to chime in on the original issue, and perhaps try to fix it.
If the new issue provides relevant information, such as a better or slightly different example, add it to the original issue as a comment or an edit to the original post.
Is the issue minimal and reproducible?
For bug reports, we ask that the reporter provide a minimal reproducible example. See https://matthewrocklin.com/blog/work/2018/02/28/minimal-bug-reports for a good explanation. If the example is not reproducible, or if it’s clearly not minimal, feel free to ask the reporter if they can provide and example or simplify the provided one. Do acknowledge that writing minimal reproducible examples is hard work. If the reporter is struggling, you can try to write one yourself and we’ll edit the original post to include it.
If a reproducible example can’t be provided, add the “Needs info” label.
If a reproducible example is provided, but you see a simplification, edit the original post with your simpler reproducible example.
Is this a clearly defined feature request?
Generally, pandas prefers to discuss and design new features in issues, before a pull request is made. Encourage the submitter to include a proposed API for the new feature. Having them write a full docstring is a good way to pin down specifics.
We’ll need a discussion from several pandas maintainers before deciding whether the proposal is in scope for pandas.
Is this a usage question?
We prefer that usage questions are asked on StackOverflow with the pandas tag. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/pandas
If it’s easy to answer, feel free to link to the relevant documentation section, let them know that in the future this kind of question should be on StackOverflow, and close the issue.
What labels and milestones should I add?
Apply the relevant labels. This is a bit of an art, and comes with experience. Look at similar issues to get a feel for how things are labeled.
If the issue is clearly defined and the fix seems relatively straightforward, label the issue as “Good first issue”.
Typically, new issues will be assigned the “Contributions welcome” milestone, unless it’s know that this issue should be addressed in a specific release (say because it’s a large regression).
Be delicate here: many people interpret closing an issue as us saying that the conversation is over. It’s typically best to give the reporter some time to respond or self-close their issue if it’s determined that the behavior is not a bug, or the feature is out of scope. Sometimes reporters just go away though, and we’ll close the issue after the conversation has died.
Reviewing pull requests#
Anybody can review a pull request: regular contributors, triagers, or core-team members. But only core-team members can merge pull requests when they’re ready.
Here are some things to check when reviewing a pull request.
Tests should be in a sensible location: in the same file as closely related tests.
New public APIs should be included somewhere in
New / changed API should use the
versionchangeddirectives in the docstring.
User-facing changes should have a whatsnew in the appropriate file.
Regression tests should reference the original GitHub issue number like
The pull request should be labeled and assigned the appropriate milestone (the next patch release for regression fixes and small bug fixes, the next minor milestone otherwise)
Changes should comply with our Version policy.
pandas supports point releases (e.g.
1.4.3) that aim to:
Fix bugs in new features introduced in the first minor version release.
e.g. If a new feature was added in
1.4and contains a bug, a fix can be applied in
Fix bugs that used to work in a few minor releases prior. There should be agreement between core team members that a backport is appropriate.
e.g. If a feature worked in
1.2and stopped working since
1.3, a fix can be applied in
Since pandas minor releases are based on Github branches (e.g. point release of
1.4 are based off the
“backporting” means merging a pull request fix to the
main branch and correct minor branch associated with the next point release.
By default, if a pull request is assigned to the next point release milestone within the Github interface,
the backporting process should happen automatically by the
@meeseeksdev bot once the pull request is merged.
A new pull request will be made backporting the pull request to the correct version branch.
Sometimes due to merge conflicts, a manual pull request will need to be made addressing the code conflict.
If the bot does not automatically start the backporting process, you can also write a Github comment in the merged pull request to trigger the backport:
@meeseeksdev backport version-branch
This will trigger a workflow which will backport a given change to a branch (e.g. @meeseeksdev backport 1.4.x)
Cleaning up old issues#
Every open issue in pandas has a cost. Open issues make finding duplicates harder, and can make it harder to know what needs to be done in pandas. That said, closing issues isn’t a goal on its own. Our goal is to make pandas the best it can be, and that’s best done by ensuring that the quality of our open issues is high.
Occasionally, bugs are fixed but the issue isn’t linked to in the Pull Request. In these cases, comment that “This has been fixed, but could use a test.” and label the issue as “Good First Issue” and “Needs Test”.
If an older issue doesn’t follow our issue template, edit the original post to include a minimal example, the actual output, and the expected output. Uniformity in issue reports is valuable.
If an older issue lacks a reproducible example, label it as “Needs Info” and ask them to provide one (or write one yourself if possible). If one isn’t provide reasonably soon, close it according to the policies in Closing issues.
Cleaning up old pull requests#
Occasionally, contributors are unable to finish off a pull request. If some time has passed (two weeks, say) since the last review requesting changes, gently ask if they’re still interested in working on this. If another two weeks or so passes with no response, thank them for their work and close the pull request. Comment on the original issue that “There’s a stalled PR at #1234 that may be helpful.”, and perhaps label the issue as “Good first issue” if the PR was relatively close to being accepted.
Additionally, core-team members can push to contributors branches. This can be helpful for pushing an important PR across the line, or for fixing a small merge conflict.
Becoming a pandas maintainer#
The full process is outlined in our governance documents. In summary, we’re happy to give triage permissions to anyone who shows interest by being helpful on the issue tracker.
The required steps for adding a maintainer are:
Contact the contributor and ask their interest to join.
Add the contributor to the appropriate Github Team if accepted the invitation.
pandas-coreis for core team members
pandas-triageis for pandas triage members
Add the contributor to the pandas Google group.
Create a pull request to add the contributor’s Github handle to
Create a pull request to add the contributor’s name/Github handle to the governance document.
The current list of core-team members is at https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas-governance/blob/master/people.md
Merging pull requests#
Only core team members can merge pull requests. We have a few guidelines.
You should typically not self-merge your own pull requests. Exceptions include things like small changes to fix CI (e.g. pinning a package version).
You should not merge pull requests that have an active discussion, or pull requests that has any
-1votes from a core maintainer. pandas operates by consensus.
For larger changes, it’s good to have a +1 from at least two core team members.
In addition to the items listed in Closing issues, you should verify that the pull request is assigned the correct milestone.
Pull requests merged with a patch-release milestone will typically be backported by our bot. Verify that the bot noticed the merge (it will leave a comment within a minute typically). If a manual backport is needed please do that, and remove the “Needs backport” label once you’ve done it manually. If you forget to assign a milestone before tagging, you can request the bot to backport it with:
@Meeseeksdev backport <branch>
The team currently owns dedicated hardware for hosting a website for pandas’ ASV performance benchmark. The results are published to http://pandas.pydata.org/speed/pandas/
The machine can be configured with the Ansible playbook in https://github.com/tomaugspurger/asv-runner.
The results are published to another Github repository, https://github.com/tomaugspurger/asv-collection.
Finally, we have a cron job on our docs server to pull from https://github.com/tomaugspurger/asv-collection, to serve them from
Ask Tom or Joris for access to the webserver.
The benchmarks are scheduled by Airflow. It has a dashboard for viewing and debugging the results. You’ll need to setup an SSH tunnel to view them
ssh -L 8080:localhost:8080 email@example.com
The process for releasing a new version of pandas can be found at https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas-release