Categorical Data¶

New in version 0.15.

Note

While there was pandas.Categorical in earlier versions, the ability to use categorical data in Series and DataFrame is new.

This is an introduction to pandas categorical data type, including a short comparison with R’s factor.

Categoricals are a pandas data type, which correspond to categorical variables in statistics: a variable, which can take on only a limited, and usually fixed, number of possible values (categories; levels in R). Examples are gender, social class, blood types, country affiliations, observation time or ratings via Likert scales.

In contrast to statistical categorical variables, categorical data might have an order (e.g. ‘strongly agree’ vs ‘agree’ or ‘first observation’ vs. ‘second observation’), but numerical operations (additions, divisions, ...) are not possible.

All values of categorical data are either in categories or np.nan. Order is defined by the order of categories, not lexical order of the values. Internally, the data structure consists of a categories array and an integer array of codes which point to the real value in the categories array.

The categorical data type is useful in the following cases:

A string variable consisting of only a few different values. Converting such a string variable to a categorical variable will save some memory, see here.
The lexical order of a variable is not the same as the logical order (“one”, “two”, “three”). By converting to a categorical and specifying an order on the categories, sorting and min/max will use the logical order instead of the lexical order, see here.
As a signal to other python libraries that this column should be treated as a categorical variable (e.g. to use suitable statistical methods or plot types).

Object Creation¶

Categorical Series or columns in a DataFrame can be created in several ways:

By specifying dtype="category" when constructing a Series:

In [1]: s = pd.Series(["a","b","c","a"], dtype="category")

In [2]: s
Out[2]: 
0    a
1    b
2    c
3    a
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

By converting an existing Series or column to a category dtype:

In [3]: df = pd.DataFrame({"A":["a","b","c","a"]})

In [4]: df["B"] = df["A"].astype('category')

In [5]: df
Out[5]: 
   A  B
0  a  a
1  b  b
2  c  c
3  a  a

By using some special functions:

In [6]: df = pd.DataFrame({'value': np.random.randint(0, 100, 20)})

In [7]: labels = [ "{0} - {1}".format(i, i + 9) for i in range(0, 100, 10) ]

In [8]: df['group'] = pd.cut(df.value, range(0, 105, 10), right=False, labels=labels)

In [9]: df.head(10)
Out[9]: 
   value    group
0     65  60 - 69
1     49  40 - 49
2     56  50 - 59
3     43  40 - 49
4     43  40 - 49
5     91  90 - 99
6     32  30 - 39
7     87  80 - 89
8     36  30 - 39
9      8    0 - 9

See documentation for cut().

By passing a pandas.Categorical object to a Series or assigning it to a DataFrame.

In [10]: raw_cat = pd.Categorical(["a","b","c","a"], categories=["b","c","d"],
   ....:                          ordered=False)
   ....: 

In [11]: s = pd.Series(raw_cat)

In [12]: s
Out[12]: 
0    NaN
1      b
2      c
3    NaN
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [b, c, d]

In [13]: df = pd.DataFrame({"A":["a","b","c","a"]})

In [14]: df["B"] = raw_cat

In [15]: df
Out[15]: 
   A    B
0  a  NaN
1  b    b
2  c    c
3  a  NaN

You can also specify differently ordered categories or make the resulting data ordered, by passing these arguments to astype():

In [16]: s = pd.Series(["a","b","c","a"])

In [17]: s_cat = s.astype("category", categories=["b","c","d"], ordered=False)

In [18]: s_cat
Out[18]: 
0    NaN
1      b
2      c
3    NaN
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [b, c, d]

Categorical data has a specific category dtype:

In [19]: df.dtypes
Out[19]: 
A      object
B    category
dtype: object

Note

In contrast to R’s factor function, categorical data is not converting input values to strings and categories will end up the same data type as the original values.

Note

In contrast to R’s factor function, there is currently no way to assign/change labels at creation time. Use categories to change the categories after creation time.

To get back to the original Series or numpy array, use Series.astype(original_dtype) or np.asarray(categorical):

In [20]: s = pd.Series(["a","b","c","a"])

In [21]: s
Out[21]: 
0    a
1    b
2    c
3    a
dtype: object

In [22]: s2 = s.astype('category')

In [23]: s2
Out[23]: 
0    a
1    b
2    c
3    a
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

In [24]: s2.astype(str)
Out[24]: 
0    a
1    b
2    c
3    a
dtype: object

In [25]: np.asarray(s2)
Out[25]: array(['a', 'b', 'c', 'a'], dtype=object)

If you have already codes and categories, you can use the from_codes() constructor to save the factorize step during normal constructor mode:

In [26]: splitter = np.random.choice([0,1], 5, p=[0.5,0.5])

In [27]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical.from_codes(splitter, categories=["train", "test"]))

Description¶

Using .describe() on categorical data will produce similar output to a Series or DataFrame of type string.

In [28]: cat = pd.Categorical(["a", "c", "c", np.nan], categories=["b", "a", "c"])

In [29]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cat":cat, "s":["a", "c", "c", np.nan]})

In [30]: df.describe()
Out[30]: 
       cat  s
count    3  3
unique   2  2
top      c  c
freq     2  2

In [31]: df["cat"].describe()
Out[31]: 
count     3
unique    2
top       c
freq      2
Name: cat, dtype: object

Working with categories¶

Categorical data has a categories and a ordered property, which list their possible values and whether the ordering matters or not. These properties are exposed as s.cat.categories and s.cat.ordered. If you don’t manually specify categories and ordering, they are inferred from the passed in values.

In [32]: s = pd.Series(["a","b","c","a"], dtype="category")

In [33]: s.cat.categories
Out[33]: Index(['a', 'b', 'c'], dtype='object')

In [34]: s.cat.ordered
Out[34]: False

It’s also possible to pass in the categories in a specific order:

In [35]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a","b","c","a"], categories=["c","b","a"]))

In [36]: s.cat.categories
Out[36]: Index(['c', 'b', 'a'], dtype='object')

In [37]: s.cat.ordered
Out[37]: False

Note

New categorical data are NOT automatically ordered. You must explicitly pass ordered=True to indicate an ordered Categorical.

Note

The result of Series.unique() is not always the same as Series.cat.categories, because Series.unique() has a couple of guarantees, namely that it returns categories in the order of appearance, and it only includes values that are actually present.

In [38]: s = pd.Series(list('babc')).astype('category', categories=list('abcd'))

In [39]: s
Out[39]: 
0    b
1    a
2    b
3    c
dtype: category
Categories (4, object): [a, b, c, d]

# categories
In [40]: s.cat.categories
Out[40]: Index(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], dtype='object')

# uniques
In [41]: s.unique()
Out[41]: 
[b, a, c]
Categories (3, object): [b, a, c]

Renaming categories¶

Renaming categories is done by assigning new values to the Series.cat.categories property or by using the Categorical.rename_categories() method:

In [42]: s = pd.Series(["a","b","c","a"], dtype="category")

In [43]: s
Out[43]: 
0    a
1    b
2    c
3    a
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

In [44]: s.cat.categories = ["Group %s" % g for g in s.cat.categories]

In [45]: s
Out[45]: 
0    Group a
1    Group b
2    Group c
3    Group a
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [Group a, Group b, Group c]

In [46]: s.cat.rename_categories([1,2,3])
Out[46]: 
0    1
1    2
2    3
3    1
dtype: category
Categories (3, int64): [1, 2, 3]

Note

In contrast to R’s factor, categorical data can have categories of other types than string.

Note

Be aware that assigning new categories is an inplace operations, while most other operation under Series.cat per default return a new Series of dtype category.

Categories must be unique or a ValueError is raised:

In [47]: try:
   ....:     s.cat.categories = [1,1,1]
   ....: except ValueError as e:
   ....:     print("ValueError: " + str(e))
   ....: 
ValueError: Categorical categories must be unique

Categories must also not be NaN or a ValueError is raised:

In [48]: try:
   ....:     s.cat.categories = [1,2,np.nan]
   ....: except ValueError as e:
   ....:     print("ValueError: " + str(e))
   ....: 
ValueError: Categorial categories cannot be null

Appending new categories¶

Appending categories can be done by using the Categorical.add_categories() method:

In [49]: s = s.cat.add_categories([4])

In [50]: s.cat.categories
Out[50]: Index(['Group a', 'Group b', 'Group c', 4], dtype='object')

In [51]: s
Out[51]: 
0    Group a
1    Group b
2    Group c
3    Group a
dtype: category
Categories (4, object): [Group a, Group b, Group c, 4]

Removing categories¶

Removing categories can be done by using the Categorical.remove_categories() method. Values which are removed are replaced by np.nan.:

In [52]: s = s.cat.remove_categories([4])

In [53]: s
Out[53]: 
0    Group a
1    Group b
2    Group c
3    Group a
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [Group a, Group b, Group c]

Removing unused categories¶

Removing unused categories can also be done:

In [54]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a","b","a"], categories=["a","b","c","d"]))

In [55]: s
Out[55]: 
0    a
1    b
2    a
dtype: category
Categories (4, object): [a, b, c, d]

In [56]: s.cat.remove_unused_categories()
Out[56]: 
0    a
1    b
2    a
dtype: category
Categories (2, object): [a, b]

Setting categories¶

If you want to do remove and add new categories in one step (which has some speed advantage), or simply set the categories to a predefined scale, use Categorical.set_categories().

In [57]: s = pd.Series(["one","two","four", "-"], dtype="category")

In [58]: s
Out[58]: 
0     one
1     two
2    four
3       -
dtype: category
Categories (4, object): [-, four, one, two]

In [59]: s = s.cat.set_categories(["one","two","three","four"])

In [60]: s
Out[60]: 
0     one
1     two
2    four
3     NaN
dtype: category
Categories (4, object): [one, two, three, four]

Note

Be aware that Categorical.set_categories() cannot know whether some category is omitted intentionally or because it is misspelled or (under Python3) due to a type difference (e.g., numpys S1 dtype and python strings). This can result in surprising behaviour!

Sorting and Order¶

Warning

The default for construction has changed in v0.16.0 to ordered=False, from the prior implicit ordered=True

If categorical data is ordered (s.cat.ordered == True), then the order of the categories has a meaning and certain operations are possible. If the categorical is unordered, .min()/.max() will raise a TypeError.

In [61]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a","b","c","a"], ordered=False))

In [62]: s.sort_values(inplace=True)

In [63]: s = pd.Series(["a","b","c","a"]).astype('category', ordered=True)

In [64]: s.sort_values(inplace=True)

In [65]: s
Out[65]: 
0    a
3    a
1    b
2    c
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [a < b < c]

In [66]: s.min(), s.max()
Out[66]: ('a', 'c')

You can set categorical data to be ordered by using as_ordered() or unordered by using as_unordered(). These will by default return a new object.

In [67]: s.cat.as_ordered()
Out[67]: 
0    a
3    a
1    b
2    c
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [a < b < c]

In [68]: s.cat.as_unordered()
Out[68]: 
0    a
3    a
1    b
2    c
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

Sorting will use the order defined by categories, not any lexical order present on the data type. This is even true for strings and numeric data:

In [69]: s = pd.Series([1,2,3,1], dtype="category")

In [70]: s = s.cat.set_categories([2,3,1], ordered=True)

In [71]: s
Out[71]: 
0    1
1    2
2    3
3    1
dtype: category
Categories (3, int64): [2 < 3 < 1]

In [72]: s.sort_values(inplace=True)

In [73]: s
Out[73]: 
1    2
2    3
0    1
3    1
dtype: category
Categories (3, int64): [2 < 3 < 1]

In [74]: s.min(), s.max()
Out[74]: (2, 1)

Reordering¶

Reordering the categories is possible via the Categorical.reorder_categories() and the Categorical.set_categories() methods. For Categorical.reorder_categories(), all old categories must be included in the new categories and no new categories are allowed. This will necessarily make the sort order the same as the categories order.

In [75]: s = pd.Series([1,2,3,1], dtype="category")

In [76]: s = s.cat.reorder_categories([2,3,1], ordered=True)

In [77]: s
Out[77]: 
0    1
1    2
2    3
3    1
dtype: category
Categories (3, int64): [2 < 3 < 1]

In [78]: s.sort_values(inplace=True)

In [79]: s
Out[79]: 
1    2
2    3
0    1
3    1
dtype: category
Categories (3, int64): [2 < 3 < 1]

In [80]: s.min(), s.max()
Out[80]: (2, 1)

Note

Note the difference between assigning new categories and reordering the categories: the first renames categories and therefore the individual values in the Series, but if the first position was sorted last, the renamed value will still be sorted last. Reordering means that the way values are sorted is different afterwards, but not that individual values in the Series are changed.

Note

If the Categorical is not ordered, Series.min() and Series.max() will raise TypeError. Numeric operations like +, -, *, / and operations based on them (e.g. Series.median(), which would need to compute the mean between two values if the length of an array is even) do not work and raise a TypeError.

Multi Column Sorting¶

A categorical dtyped column will participate in a multi-column sort in a similar manner to other columns. The ordering of the categorical is determined by the categories of that column.

In [81]: dfs = pd.DataFrame({'A' : pd.Categorical(list('bbeebbaa'), categories=['e','a','b'], ordered=True),
   ....:                     'B' : [1,2,1,2,2,1,2,1] })
   ....: 

In [82]: dfs.sort_values(by=['A', 'B'])
Out[82]: 
   A  B
2  e  1
3  e  2
7  a  1
6  a  2
0  b  1
5  b  1
1  b  2
4  b  2

Reordering the categories changes a future sort.

In [83]: dfs['A'] = dfs['A'].cat.reorder_categories(['a','b','e'])

In [84]: dfs.sort_values(by=['A','B'])
Out[84]: 
   A  B
7  a  1
6  a  2
0  b  1
5  b  1
1  b  2
4  b  2
2  e  1
3  e  2

Comparisons¶

Comparing categorical data with other objects is possible in three cases:

comparing equality (== and !=) to a list-like object (list, Series, array, ...) of the same length as the categorical data.

all comparisons (==, !=, >, >=, <, and <=) of categorical data to another categorical Series, when ordered==True and the categories are the same.

all comparisons of a categorical data to a scalar.

All other comparisons, especially “non-equality” comparisons of two categoricals with different categories or a categorical with any list-like object, will raise a TypeError.

Note

Any “non-equality” comparisons of categorical data with a Series, np.array, list or categorical data with different categories or ordering will raise an TypeError because custom categories ordering could be interpreted in two ways: one with taking into account the ordering and one without.

In [85]: cat = pd.Series([1,2,3]).astype("category", categories=[3,2,1], ordered=True)

In [86]: cat_base = pd.Series([2,2,2]).astype("category", categories=[3,2,1], ordered=True)

In [87]: cat_base2 = pd.Series([2,2,2]).astype("category", ordered=True)

In [88]: cat
Out[88]: 
0    1
1    2
2    3
dtype: category
Categories (3, int64): [3 < 2 < 1]

In [89]: cat_base
Out[89]: 
0    2
1    2
2    2
dtype: category
Categories (3, int64): [3 < 2 < 1]

In [90]: cat_base2
Out[90]: 
0    2
1    2
2    2
dtype: category
Categories (1, int64): [2]

Comparing to a categorical with the same categories and ordering or to a scalar works:

In [91]: cat > cat_base
Out[91]: 
0     True
1    False
2    False
dtype: bool

In [92]: cat > 2
Out[92]: 
0     True
1    False
2    False
dtype: bool

Equality comparisons work with any list-like object of same length and scalars:

In [93]: cat == cat_base
Out[93]: 
0    False
1     True
2    False
dtype: bool

In [94]: cat == np.array([1,2,3])
Out[94]: 
0    True
1    True
2    True
dtype: bool

In [95]: cat == 2
Out[95]: 
0    False
1     True
2    False
dtype: bool

This doesn’t work because the categories are not the same:

In [96]: try:
   ....:     cat > cat_base2
   ....: except TypeError as e:
   ....:      print("TypeError: " + str(e))
   ....: 
TypeError: Categoricals can only be compared if 'categories' are the same. Categories are different lengths

If you want to do a “non-equality” comparison of a categorical series with a list-like object which is not categorical data, you need to be explicit and convert the categorical data back to the original values:

In [97]: base = np.array([1,2,3])

In [98]: try:
   ....:     cat > base
   ....: except TypeError as e:
   ....:      print("TypeError: " + str(e))
   ....: 
TypeError: Cannot compare a Categorical for op __gt__ with type <class 'numpy.ndarray'>.
If you want to compare values, use 'np.asarray(cat) <op> other'.

In [99]: np.asarray(cat) > base
Out[99]: array([False, False, False], dtype=bool)

When you compare two unordered categoricals with the same categories, the order is not considered:

In [100]: c1 = pd.Categorical(['a', 'b'], categories=['a', 'b'], ordered=False)

In [101]: c2 = pd.Categorical(['a', 'b'], categories=['b', 'a'], ordered=False)

In [102]: c1 == c2
Out[102]: array([ True,  True], dtype=bool)

Operations¶

Apart from Series.min(), Series.max() and Series.mode(), the following operations are possible with categorical data:

Series methods like Series.value_counts() will use all categories, even if some categories are not present in the data:

In [103]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a","b","c","c"], categories=["c","a","b","d"]))

In [104]: s.value_counts()
Out[104]: 
c    2
b    1
a    1
d    0
dtype: int64

Groupby will also show “unused” categories:

In [105]: cats = pd.Categorical(["a","b","b","b","c","c","c"], categories=["a","b","c","d"])

In [106]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats":cats,"values":[1,2,2,2,3,4,5]})

In [107]: df.groupby("cats").mean()
Out[107]: 
      values
cats        
a        1.0
b        2.0
c        4.0
d        NaN

In [108]: cats2 = pd.Categorical(["a","a","b","b"], categories=["a","b","c"])

In [109]: df2 = pd.DataFrame({"cats":cats2,"B":["c","d","c","d"], "values":[1,2,3,4]})

In [110]: df2.groupby(["cats","B"]).mean()
Out[110]: 
        values
cats B        
a    c     1.0
     d     2.0
b    c     3.0
     d     4.0
c    c     NaN
     d     NaN

Pivot tables:

In [111]: raw_cat = pd.Categorical(["a","a","b","b"], categories=["a","b","c"])

In [112]: df = pd.DataFrame({"A":raw_cat,"B":["c","d","c","d"], "values":[1,2,3,4]})

In [113]: pd.pivot_table(df, values='values', index=['A', 'B'])
Out[113]: 
     values
A B        
a c     1.0
  d     2.0
b c     3.0
  d     4.0
c c     NaN
  d     NaN

Data munging¶

The optimized pandas data access methods .loc, .iloc, .at, and .iat, work as normal. The only difference is the return type (for getting) and that only values already in categories can be assigned.

Getting¶

If the slicing operation returns either a DataFrame or a column of type Series, the category dtype is preserved.

In [114]: idx = pd.Index(["h","i","j","k","l","m","n",])

In [115]: cats = pd.Series(["a","b","b","b","c","c","c"], dtype="category", index=idx)

In [116]: values= [1,2,2,2,3,4,5]

In [117]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats":cats,"values":values}, index=idx)

In [118]: df.iloc[2:4,:]
Out[118]: 
  cats  values
j    b       2
k    b       2

In [119]: df.iloc[2:4,:].dtypes
Out[119]: 
cats      category
values       int64
dtype: object

In [120]: df.loc["h":"j","cats"]
Out[120]: 
h    a
i    b
j    b
Name: cats, dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

In [121]: df[df["cats"] == "b"]
Out[121]: 
  cats  values
i    b       2
j    b       2
k    b       2

An example where the category type is not preserved is if you take one single row: the resulting Series is of dtype object:

# get the complete "h" row as a Series
In [122]: df.loc["h", :]
Out[122]: 
cats      a
values    1
Name: h, dtype: object

Returning a single item from categorical data will also return the value, not a categorical of length “1”.

In [123]: df.iat[0,0]
Out[123]: 'a'

In [124]: df["cats"].cat.categories = ["x","y","z"]

In [125]: df.at["h","cats"] # returns a string
Out[125]: 'x'

Note

This is a difference to R’s factor function, where factor(c(1,2,3))[1] returns a single value factor.

To get a single value Series of type category pass in a list with a single value:

In [126]: df.loc[["h"],"cats"]
Out[126]: 
h    x
Name: cats, dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [x, y, z]

String and datetime accessors¶

New in version 0.17.1.

The accessors .dt and .str will work if the s.cat.categories are of an appropriate type:

In [127]: str_s = pd.Series(list('aabb'))

In [128]: str_cat = str_s.astype('category')

In [129]: str_cat
Out[129]: 
0    a
1    a
2    b
3    b
dtype: category
Categories (2, object): [a, b]

In [130]: str_cat.str.contains("a")
Out[130]: 
0     True
1     True
2    False
3    False
dtype: bool

In [131]: date_s = pd.Series(pd.date_range('1/1/2015', periods=5))

In [132]: date_cat = date_s.astype('category')

In [133]: date_cat
Out[133]: 
0   2015-01-01
1   2015-01-02
2   2015-01-03
3   2015-01-04
4   2015-01-05
dtype: category
Categories (5, datetime64[ns]): [2015-01-01, 2015-01-02, 2015-01-03, 2015-01-04, 2015-01-05]

In [134]: date_cat.dt.day
Out[134]: 
0    1
1    2
2    3
3    4
4    5
dtype: int64

Note

The returned Series (or DataFrame) is of the same type as if you used the .str.<method> / .dt.<method> on a Series of that type (and not of type category!).

That means, that the returned values from methods and properties on the accessors of a Series and the returned values from methods and properties on the accessors of this Series transformed to one of type category will be equal:

In [135]: ret_s = str_s.str.contains("a")

In [136]: ret_cat = str_cat.str.contains("a")

In [137]: ret_s.dtype == ret_cat.dtype
Out[137]: True

In [138]: ret_s == ret_cat
Out[138]: 
0    True
1    True
2    True
3    True
dtype: bool

Note

The work is done on the categories and then a new Series is constructed. This has some performance implication if you have a Series of type string, where lots of elements are repeated (i.e. the number of unique elements in the Series is a lot smaller than the length of the Series). In this case it can be faster to convert the original Series to one of type category and use .str.<method> or .dt.<property> on that.

Setting¶

Setting values in a categorical column (or Series) works as long as the value is included in the categories:

In [139]: idx = pd.Index(["h","i","j","k","l","m","n"])

In [140]: cats = pd.Categorical(["a","a","a","a","a","a","a"], categories=["a","b"])

In [141]: values = [1,1,1,1,1,1,1]

In [142]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats":cats,"values":values}, index=idx)

In [143]: df.iloc[2:4,:] = [["b",2],["b",2]]

In [144]: df
Out[144]: 
  cats  values
h    a       1
i    a       1
j    b       2
k    b       2
l    a       1
m    a       1
n    a       1

In [145]: try:
   .....:     df.iloc[2:4,:] = [["c",3],["c",3]]
   .....: except ValueError as e:
   .....:     print("ValueError: " + str(e))
   .....: 
ValueError: Cannot setitem on a Categorical with a new category, set the categories first

Setting values by assigning categorical data will also check that the categories match:

In [146]: df.loc["j":"k","cats"] = pd.Categorical(["a","a"], categories=["a","b"])

In [147]: df
Out[147]: 
  cats  values
h    a       1
i    a       1
j    a       2
k    a       2
l    a       1
m    a       1
n    a       1

In [148]: try:
   .....:     df.loc["j":"k","cats"] = pd.Categorical(["b","b"], categories=["a","b","c"])
   .....: except ValueError as e:
   .....:     print("ValueError: " + str(e))
   .....: 
ValueError: Cannot set a Categorical with another, without identical categories

Assigning a Categorical to parts of a column of other types will use the values:

In [149]: df = pd.DataFrame({"a":[1,1,1,1,1], "b":["a","a","a","a","a"]})

In [150]: df.loc[1:2,"a"] = pd.Categorical(["b","b"], categories=["a","b"])

In [151]: df.loc[2:3,"b"] = pd.Categorical(["b","b"], categories=["a","b"])

In [152]: df
Out[152]: 
   a  b
0  1  a
1  b  a
2  b  b
3  1  b
4  1  a

In [153]: df.dtypes
Out[153]: 
a    object
b    object
dtype: object

Merging¶

You can concat two DataFrames containing categorical data together, but the categories of these categoricals need to be the same:

In [154]: cat = pd.Series(["a","b"], dtype="category")

In [155]: vals = [1,2]

In [156]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats":cat, "vals":vals})

In [157]: res = pd.concat([df,df])

In [158]: res
Out[158]: 
  cats  vals
0    a     1
1    b     2
0    a     1
1    b     2

In [159]: res.dtypes
Out[159]: 
cats    category
vals       int64
dtype: object

In this case the categories are not the same and so an error is raised:

In [160]: df_different = df.copy()

In [161]: df_different["cats"].cat.categories = ["c","d"]

In [162]: try:
   .....:     pd.concat([df,df_different])
   .....: except ValueError as e:
   .....:     print("ValueError: " + str(e))
   .....: 

The same applies to df.append(df_different).

See also the section on merge dtypes for notes about preserving merge dtypes and performance.

Unioning¶

New in version 0.19.0.

If you want to combine categoricals that do not necessarily have the same categories, the union_categoricals function will combine a list-like of categoricals. The new categories will be the union of the categories being combined.

In [163]: from pandas.api.types import union_categoricals

In [164]: a = pd.Categorical(["b", "c"])

In [165]: b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"])

In [166]: union_categoricals([a, b])
Out[166]: 
[b, c, a, b]
Categories (3, object): [b, c, a]

By default, the resulting categories will be ordered as they appear in the data. If you want the categories to be lexsorted, use sort_categories=True argument.

In [167]: union_categoricals([a, b], sort_categories=True)
Out[167]: 
[b, c, a, b]
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

union_categoricals also works with the “easy” case of combining two categoricals of the same categories and order information (e.g. what you could also append for).

In [168]: a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"], ordered=True)

In [169]: b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "a"], ordered=True)

In [170]: union_categoricals([a, b])
Out[170]: 
[a, b, a, b, a]
Categories (2, object): [a < b]

The below raises TypeError because the categories are ordered and not identical.

In [1]: a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"], ordered=True)
In [2]: b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c"], ordered=True)
In [3]: union_categoricals([a, b])
Out[3]:
TypeError: to union ordered Categoricals, all categories must be the same

New in version 0.20.0.

Ordered categoricals with different categories or orderings can be combined by using the ignore_ordered=True argument.

In [171]: a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c"], ordered=True)

In [172]: b = pd.Categorical(["c", "b", "a"], ordered=True)

In [173]: union_categoricals([a, b], ignore_order=True)
Out[173]: 
[a, b, c, c, b, a]
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

union_categoricals also works with a CategoricalIndex, or Series containing categorical data, but note that the resulting array will always be a plain Categorical

In [174]: a = pd.Series(["b", "c"], dtype='category')

In [175]: b = pd.Series(["a", "b"], dtype='category')

In [176]: union_categoricals([a, b])
Out[176]: 
[b, c, a, b]
Categories (3, object): [b, c, a]

Note

union_categoricals may recode the integer codes for categories when combining categoricals. This is likely what you want, but if you are relying on the exact numbering of the categories, be aware.

In [177]: c1 = pd.Categorical(["b", "c"])

In [178]: c2 = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"])

In [179]: c1
Out[179]: 
[b, c]
Categories (2, object): [b, c]

# "b" is coded to 0
In [180]: c1.codes
Out[180]: array([0, 1], dtype=int8)

In [181]: c2
Out[181]: 
[a, b]
Categories (2, object): [a, b]

# "b" is coded to 1
In [182]: c2.codes
Out[182]: array([0, 1], dtype=int8)

In [183]: c = union_categoricals([c1, c2])

In [184]: c
Out[184]: 
[b, c, a, b]
Categories (3, object): [b, c, a]

# "b" is coded to 0 throughout, same as c1, different from c2
In [185]: c.codes
Out[185]: array([0, 1, 2, 0], dtype=int8)

Concatenation¶

This section describes concatenations specific to category dtype. See Concatenating objects for general description.

By default, Series or DataFrame concatenation which contains the same categories results in category dtype, otherwise results in object dtype. Use .astype or union_categoricals to get category result.

# same categories
In [186]: s1 = pd.Series(['a', 'b'], dtype='category')

In [187]: s2 = pd.Series(['a', 'b', 'a'], dtype='category')

In [188]: pd.concat([s1, s2])
Out[188]: 
0    a
1    b
0    a
1    b
2    a
dtype: category
Categories (2, object): [a, b]

# different categories
In [189]: s3 = pd.Series(['b', 'c'], dtype='category')

In [190]: pd.concat([s1, s3])
Out[190]: 
0    a
1    b
0    b
1    c
dtype: object

In [191]: pd.concat([s1, s3]).astype('category')
Out[191]: 
0    a
1    b
0    b
1    c
dtype: category
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

In [192]: union_categoricals([s1.values, s3.values])
Out[192]: 
[a, b, b, c]
Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]

Following table summarizes the results of Categoricals related concatenations.

arg1	arg2	result
category	category (identical categories)	category
category	category (different categories, both not ordered)	object (dtype is inferred)
category	category (different categories, either one is ordered)	object (dtype is inferred)
category	not category	object (dtype is inferred)

Getting Data In/Out¶

New in version 0.15.2.

Writing data (Series, Frames) to a HDF store that contains a category dtype was implemented in 0.15.2. See here for an example and caveats.

Writing data to and reading data from Stata format files was implemented in 0.15.2. See here for an example and caveats.

Writing to a CSV file will convert the data, effectively removing any information about the categorical (categories and ordering). So if you read back the CSV file you have to convert the relevant columns back to category and assign the right categories and categories ordering.

In [193]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(['a', 'b', 'b', 'a', 'a', 'd']))

# rename the categories
In [194]: s.cat.categories = ["very good", "good", "bad"]

# reorder the categories and add missing categories
In [195]: s = s.cat.set_categories(["very bad", "bad", "medium", "good", "very good"])

In [196]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats":s, "vals":[1,2,3,4,5,6]})

In [197]: csv = StringIO()

In [198]: df.to_csv(csv)

In [199]: df2 = pd.read_csv(StringIO(csv.getvalue()))

In [200]: df2.dtypes
Out[200]: 
Unnamed: 0     int64
cats          object
vals           int64
dtype: object

In [201]: df2["cats"]
Out[201]: 
0    very good
1         good
2         good
3    very good
4    very good
5          bad
Name: cats, dtype: object

# Redo the category
In [202]: df2["cats"] = df2["cats"].astype("category")

In [203]: df2["cats"].cat.set_categories(["very bad", "bad", "medium", "good", "very good"],
   .....:                                inplace=True)
   .....: 

In [204]: df2.dtypes
Out[204]: 
Unnamed: 0       int64
cats          category
vals             int64
dtype: object

In [205]: df2["cats"]
Out[205]: 
0    very good
1         good
2         good
3    very good
4    very good
5          bad
Name: cats, dtype: category
Categories (5, object): [very bad, bad, medium, good, very good]

The same holds for writing to a SQL database with to_sql.

Missing Data¶

pandas primarily uses the value np.nan to represent missing data. It is by default not included in computations. See the Missing Data section.

Missing values should not be included in the Categorical’s categories, only in the values. Instead, it is understood that NaN is different, and is always a possibility. When working with the Categorical’s codes, missing values will always have a code of -1.

In [206]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", np.nan, "a"], dtype="category")

# only two categories
In [207]: s
Out[207]: 
0      a
1      b
2    NaN
3      a
dtype: category
Categories (2, object): [a, b]

In [208]: s.cat.codes
Out[208]: 
0    0
1    1
2   -1
3    0
dtype: int8

Methods for working with missing data, e.g. isnull(), fillna(), dropna(), all work normally:

In [209]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", np.nan], dtype="category")

In [210]: s
Out[210]: 
0      a
1      b
2    NaN
dtype: category
Categories (2, object): [a, b]

In [211]: pd.isnull(s)
Out[211]: 
0    False
1    False
2     True
dtype: bool

In [212]: s.fillna("a")
Out[212]: 
0    a
1    b
2    a
dtype: category
Categories (2, object): [a, b]

Differences to R’s factor¶

The following differences to R’s factor functions can be observed:

R’s levels are named categories
R’s levels are always of type string, while categories in pandas can be of any dtype.
It’s not possible to specify labels at creation time. Use s.cat.rename_categories(new_labels) afterwards.
In contrast to R’s factor function, using categorical data as the sole input to create a new categorical series will not remove unused categories but create a new categorical series which is equal to the passed in one!
R allows for missing values to be included in its levels (pandas’ categories). Pandas does not allow NaN categories, but missing values can still be in the values.

Gotchas¶

Memory Usage¶

The memory usage of a Categorical is proportional to the number of categories times the length of the data. In contrast, an object dtype is a constant times the length of the data.

In [213]: s = pd.Series(['foo','bar']*1000)

# object dtype
In [214]: s.nbytes
Out[214]: 16000

# category dtype
In [215]: s.astype('category').nbytes
Out[215]: 2016

Note

If the number of categories approaches the length of the data, the Categorical will use nearly the same or more memory than an equivalent object dtype representation.

In [216]: s = pd.Series(['foo%04d' % i for i in range(2000)])

# object dtype
In [217]: s.nbytes
Out[217]: 16000

# category dtype
In [218]: s.astype('category').nbytes
Out[218]: 20000

Old style constructor usage¶

In earlier versions than pandas 0.15, a Categorical could be constructed by passing in precomputed codes (called then labels) instead of values with categories. The codes were interpreted as pointers to the categories with -1 as NaN. This type of constructor usage is replaced by the special constructor Categorical.from_codes().

Unfortunately, in some special cases, using code which assumes the old style constructor usage will work with the current pandas version, resulting in subtle bugs:

>>> cat = pd.Categorical([1,2], [1,2,3])
>>> # old version
>>> cat.get_values()
array([2, 3], dtype=int64)
>>> # new version
>>> cat.get_values()
array([1, 2], dtype=int64)

Warning

If you used Categoricals with older versions of pandas, please audit your code before upgrading and change your code to use the from_codes() constructor.

Categorical is not a numpy array¶

Currently, categorical data and the underlying Categorical is implemented as a python object and not as a low-level numpy array dtype. This leads to some problems.

numpy itself doesn’t know about the new dtype:

In [219]: try:
   .....:     np.dtype("category")
   .....: except TypeError as e:
   .....:     print("TypeError: " + str(e))
   .....: 
TypeError: data type "category" not understood

In [220]: dtype = pd.Categorical(["a"]).dtype

In [221]: try:
   .....:     np.dtype(dtype)
   .....: except TypeError as e:
   .....:      print("TypeError: " + str(e))
   .....: 
TypeError: data type not understood

Dtype comparisons work:

In [222]: dtype == np.str_
Out[222]: False

In [223]: np.str_ == dtype
Out[223]: False

To check if a Series contains Categorical data, with pandas 0.16 or later, use hasattr(s, 'cat'):

In [224]: hasattr(pd.Series(['a'], dtype='category'), 'cat')
Out[224]: True

In [225]: hasattr(pd.Series(['a']), 'cat')
Out[225]: False

Using numpy functions on a Series of type category should not work as Categoricals are not numeric data (even in the case that .categories is numeric).

In [226]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical([1,2,3,4]))

In [227]: try:
   .....:     np.sum(s)
   .....: except TypeError as e:
   .....:      print("TypeError: " + str(e))
   .....: 
TypeError: Categorical cannot perform the operation sum

Note

If such a function works, please file a bug at https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas!

dtype in apply¶

Pandas currently does not preserve the dtype in apply functions: If you apply along rows you get a Series of object dtype (same as getting a row -> getting one element will return a basic type) and applying along columns will also convert to object.

In [228]: df = pd.DataFrame({"a":[1,2,3,4],
   .....:                    "b":["a","b","c","d"],
   .....:                    "cats":pd.Categorical([1,2,3,2])})
   .....: 

In [229]: df.apply(lambda row: type(row["cats"]), axis=1)
Out[229]: 
0    <class 'int'>
1    <class 'int'>
2    <class 'int'>
3    <class 'int'>
dtype: object

In [230]: df.apply(lambda col: col.dtype, axis=0)
Out[230]: 
a       object
b       object
cats    object
dtype: object

Categorical Index¶

New in version 0.16.1.

A new CategoricalIndex index type is introduced in version 0.16.1. See the advanced indexing docs for a more detailed explanation.

Setting the index, will create create a CategoricalIndex

In [231]: cats = pd.Categorical([1,2,3,4], categories=[4,2,3,1])

In [232]: strings = ["a","b","c","d"]

In [233]: values = [4,2,3,1]

In [234]: df = pd.DataFrame({"strings":strings, "values":values}, index=cats)

In [235]: df.index
Out[235]: CategoricalIndex([1, 2, 3, 4], categories=[4, 2, 3, 1], ordered=False, dtype='category')

# This now sorts by the categories order
In [236]: df.sort_index()
Out[236]: 
  strings  values
4       d       1
2       b       2
3       c       3
1       a       4

In previous versions (<0.16.1) there is no index of type category, so setting the index to categorical column will convert the categorical data to a “normal” dtype first and therefore remove any custom ordering of the categories.

Side Effects¶

Constructing a Series from a Categorical will not copy the input Categorical. This means that changes to the Series will in most cases change the original Categorical:

In [237]: cat = pd.Categorical([1,2,3,10], categories=[1,2,3,4,10])

In [238]: s = pd.Series(cat, name="cat")

In [239]: cat
Out[239]: 
[1, 2, 3, 10]
Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 10]

In [240]: s.iloc[0:2] = 10

In [241]: cat
Out[241]: 
[10, 10, 3, 10]
Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 10]

In [242]: df = pd.DataFrame(s)

In [243]: df["cat"].cat.categories = [1,2,3,4,5]

In [244]: cat
Out[244]: 
[5, 5, 3, 5]
Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Use copy=True to prevent such a behaviour or simply don’t reuse Categoricals:

In [245]: cat = pd.Categorical([1,2,3,10], categories=[1,2,3,4,10])

In [246]: s = pd.Series(cat, name="cat", copy=True)

In [247]: cat
Out[247]: 
[1, 2, 3, 10]
Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 10]

In [248]: s.iloc[0:2] = 10

In [249]: cat
Out[249]: 
[1, 2, 3, 10]
Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 10]

Note

This also happens in some cases when you supply a numpy array instead of a Categorical: using an int array (e.g. np.array([1,2,3,4])) will exhibit the same behaviour, while using a string array (e.g. np.array(["a","b","c","a"])) will not.

Table Of Contents

Search

Categorical Data¶

Object Creation¶

Description¶

Working with categories¶

Renaming categories¶

Appending new categories¶

Removing categories¶

Removing unused categories¶

Setting categories¶

Sorting and Order¶

Reordering¶

Multi Column Sorting¶

Comparisons¶

Operations¶

Data munging¶

Getting¶

String and datetime accessors¶

Setting¶

Merging¶

Unioning¶

Concatenation¶

Getting Data In/Out¶

Missing Data¶

Differences to R’s factor¶

Gotchas¶

Memory Usage¶

Old style constructor usage¶

Categorical is not a numpy array¶

dtype in apply¶

Categorical Index¶

Side Effects¶